Root-cause assessment
Evidence-based analysis with clearly documented findings.
Recurring issues need an investigation that connects evidence to action. PTS supports teams in defining problems, examining causes and documenting corrective actions through a structured RCA or 8D process.
Typical situations include recurring quality defects, process deviations, documentation-related errors, customer concerns and incomplete corrective-action records. We assess each issue against the evidence, expertise and access needed for a useful investigation.
Clarify the problem, scope and impact.
Record short-term actions to limit further impact.
Analyse data and identify potential causes.
Select actions that address verified causes.
Review effectiveness and capture learning.
Clear, structured outputs to support consistent resolution, communication and improvement.
Evidence-based analysis with clearly documented findings.
Practical actions with owners and timelines.
A complete, structured record of the 8D process.
Assessment of results and recommendations for improvement.
Issue history, applicable requirements, defect or process data, inspection or test results, previous actions and access to relevant technical and process owners. Missing evidence and validation dependencies are documented explicitly.
Relevant data, records, samples or failed parts, as available.
Background, previous occurrences and prior analysis.
Details of processes, systems and relevant changes.
No. We support evidence-based investigation and verification; outcomes depend on the cause, implemented actions and operating conditions.
The customer’s authorised owners approve operational changes and implement actions unless the contract assigns particular activities to PTS.
Share a few details about the issue and your investigation requirements.
Define the problem. Establish what happened, where and when it occurred, the affected scope and the measurable gap from the requirement.
Support containment. Record immediate actions, owners and checks to reduce further impact while the investigation continues.
Examine potential causes. Use methods such as 5 Whys, fishbone analysis or fault-tree analysis where appropriate. Distinguish hypotheses from causes supported by evidence.
Verify causes and select actions. Agree the checks needed to test the proposed root cause and evaluate whether corrective actions address it.
Review effectiveness. Assess agreed evidence over an appropriate observation period and record remaining risks, prevention actions and lessons learned.
Depending on scope, deliverables include the problem statement, evidence register, cause analysis, containment plan, corrective-action register, 8D report and effectiveness-review record.